Christians will always believe what they want to believe.
There I learned that Catholics are not Christians.That makes me happy, but I’d have a problem with the Pope, the head of the biggest church not being a Christian. Originally Posted by ox e. I could list thousands of examples but will refrain here. Oxford supporters who sang the same tribal songs, became excited when their team scored a goal, a substitute for the killing of an animal for food. I’m not sure why this is.
It is mandatory. The cosmos exists because of natural laws that sometimes humans have difficulty understanding, but are cheap essays writing service
still a simple explanation. I hate to see otherwise rational people jump to premature conclusions about what exists. But you cannot convince a Christian that the Noah story is a recycled tale. All these doctrines are tissues of lies.
What they have found are simple rules to explain life and the universe.Life exists because of evolution by the simple process of selection. This is supposed to be for any denomination. If we get our wish and banish it to the periphery it will just reemerge under a different guise as people find safety and consolation in “us versus them” Again, comparisons can be made with team sports. What eventually happened was that my posts were hidden and so I was effectively thrown out.
Most claims made by religion are manifestly absurd. Religion is constantly claiming that in some way or another it is vouchsafed from rational enquiry. Religion is constantly claiming that in some way or another it is vouchsafed from rational enquiry. God “himself” according to religion, does not actually know what proof is.
Religion frequently fails to move on when evidence shows its dogma is wrong, though sometimes it tries to quietly forget claims that become manifestly ridiculous, or call them “metaphores”. I’m not sure why this is. It could be that people turn back to religion in only very hard times.In Africa, religion is not a choice. On visits to Australia I was surprised at the strength of religious feeling there.
Religion frequently fails to move on when evidence shows its dogma is wrong, though sometimes it tries to quietly forget claims that become manifestly ridiculous, or call them “metaphores”. Genesis 6:4. Christopher Hitchens sounds like a man who is desperate for a big cause, for an agenda that will give him one last chance of some high significance, a last stab at prophet status. deleted dup. There were giants in the Earth in those days.
That being said even if we explored the universe in it’s entirety there would still be theologians who say God is not found within the physical universe. The militant atheist chooses to uphold a worldview of Animal Farm crudity: atheist good, believer bad. Right. But almost every new religion is formed because “those other XXXers aren’t real XXXers any more! So we’ll create a church so that we can be the REAL XXXers.” When of course, they cannot prove it.
Originally Posted by ZeroZero “Intellectual cowardice?” I would say that to base a doctrine on “faith” is an act of intellectual cowardice. Any thoughts, please. “Intellectual cowardice?” I would say that to base a doctrine on “faith” is an act of intellectual cowardice. Given that we haven’t explored even a percentage point of known space I don’t think we can yet determine if there is any being within the universe that would fit the concept of God.
On the other hand, religion is based on the supernatural which is baffling and unsupported and too complex for the human mind. Could be a reference to large fossils.Another idea put forward is that the ancient Greeks finding marine fossils on mountains assumed there must have been a catastrophic flood. The reason I bring this up is because when arguing for atheism I was called a coward by a Christian. How do you bring out the best and keep it there?
Even those sad street preachers are not dealing drugs on the street corners and are outside getting a bit of fresh air . I’m sure you’re right that ancient myths were copied into different folklores. Is religion not just another form of tribalism?If we get our wish and banish it to the periphery it will just reemerge under a different guise as people find safety and consolation in “us versus them”Let’s look for the best in people whilst not fooling ourselves to our weaknesses.Even those sad street preachers are not dealing drugs on the street corners and are outside getting a bit of fresh air .Thanks for that NYT link btw.Great fun. Originally Posted by mathman Bible flood story seems to come from Gilgamesh story, which long predates Greek civilization. Originally Posted by ox Originally Posted by ZeroZero “Intellectual cowardice?” I would say that to base a doctrine on “faith” is an act of intellectual cowardice.
Originally Posted by mmatt9876 I thought the Protestant faith emerged out of the Catholic faith. I thought the Protestant faith emerged out of the Catholic faith. It’s a conundrum and it can not be entirely proven or disproved.
I believe it’s true to say that people have a good side and a bad one. I consider the atheist’s desire to generalise about religion to be a case of intellectual cowardice. In theory if God is a physical entity then it could be anywhere in the universe. Religion frequently fails to move on when evidence shows its dogma is wrong, though sometimes it tries to quietly forget claims that become manifestly ridiculous, or call them “metaphores”. What Christians are actually saying is that you are not allowed to challenge their beliefs.
Most claims made by religion are manifestly absurd. Bible flood story seems to come from Gilgamesh story, which long predates Greek civilization.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilgamesh_flood_myth Most claims made by religion are manifestly absurd. Small victories on the personal level and lets choose democratic leaders who have a clue as to how to achieve that on the societal level. I always thought the existence of God is something to be determined.
Theists love to state that God is knowable even when there are things only God knows.Some theists have in recent times moved away from creationism, because of the ridicule it has inspired, and now favour intelligent design to ‘prove’ the existence of God. As a nominal Catholic myself I joined the debate on the Worthy Christian Forum. There were giants in the Earth in those days.
Catholics are Christian, other denominations may not lime that, but they arw still worshiping the same base deity, with some changes, just as Mormons, merhodists, Lutherans, and orthodox do. Christianity in the UK is decline, especially in the Anglican Church. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20…titudes-surveyYet I see an increase in the number of street preachers, and Islam. This was then copied into the folklore of other nations.
I could list thousands of examples but will refrain here. Another idea put forward is that the ancient Greeks finding marine fossils on mountains assumed there must have been a catastrophic flood. Wasn’t that an example of “first they came for…..”?No I don’t have a general prescription for cultivating the best in others but I doubt that it is an impossible problem and there are people who would be up for it.
The reason I bring this up is because when arguing for atheism I was called a coward by a Christian. He has to believe this; it is his claim to the moral high ground. What I find incredulous is that God’s proof of his own existence – sending his “son” , burning bushes, parting waters, turning water into wine, healing a few lepers (and leaving the rest to rot and suffer), are NOT any way to prove anything -they are non sequiturs. But there are new bases for the Mormons and Scientologists, trying to fill the void.
I believe it’s true to say that people have a good side and a bad one. There is little doubt that many people go to church out of loyalty to the tribe. I have to believe that scientists are not deliberately looking for complexity. His ‘proofs’ are like charlatan tricks, for the gullible. One exception to Occam’s Razor is arguably religion.It seems the atheist spring inspired by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens is running out of steam, and the theists are being let back in.
Fresh air in the centre of which town? Thanks for that NYT link btw.Great fun. Let’s look for the best in people whilst not fooling ourselves to our weaknesses. Any thoughts, please.
The cosmos exists because of natural laws that sometimes humans have difficulty understanding, but are still a simple explanation. It could be that so much negativity is broadcast about religion by the media. Theists love to state that God is knowable even when there are things only God knows.Some theists have in recent times moved away from creationism, because of the ridicule it has inspired, and now favour intelligent design to ‘prove’ the existence of God. On the other hand, religion is based on the supernatural which is baffling and unsupported and too complex for the human mind. Originally Posted by ox Christianity in the UK is decline, especially in the Anglican Church. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20…titudes-surveyYet I see an increase in the number of street preachers, and Islam.
Where I live there are an astonishing number of different churches, but I guess the congregations are not getting younger. Religion is constantly claiming that in some way or another it is vouchsafed from rational enquiry. Here’s one that Christians believe confirms Genesis 6:4.https://www.thoughtco.com/giant-huma…greece-3299810It’s one of several similar hoaxes of course. Things you may not get elsewhere.
How do you bring out the best and keep it there? Well my advice is for the sake of one’s personal sanity.We can’t let ourselves be dragged down to others’ levels ,as we perceive it.Look at T today going on about “animals”. Christians will always believe what they want to believe. Where I live there are an astonishing number of different churches, but I guess the congregations are not getting younger. On visits to Australia I was surprised at the strength of religious feeling there.
When of course, they cannot prove it. It could be that so much negativity is broadcast about religion by the media. I could list thousands of examples but will refrain here.
I think the point ox was trying to make is that to a lot of protestant loonies the pope is basically the anti-christ and in their opinion catholics are not “real ” christians… However marine fossils found much higher than sea level are much older than Gilgamesh. One exception to Occam’s Razor is arguably religion.It seems the atheist spring inspired by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens is running out of steam, and the theists are being let back in. Genesis 6:4.
By seeking his grand purpose in atheism he exhibits the sort of intellectual timidity he claims to despise. At least the dealers are not trying to get into my head. Other widespread views did include atheists being cowards, creationism, Adam and Eve, Noah’s Ark, Heaven and Hell. But there are new bases for the Mormons and Scientologists, trying to fill the void. I remember Desmond Morris talking of the ‘soccer tribe’.
If you stand up to bullies I don’t think that makes you a coward. It is mandatory. Yes and intelligent design has also been debunked – comprehensively in The Blind Watchmaker and elsewhere. The intellectual coward is one who chooses simplicity over complexity and difficulty.
This was then copied into the folklore of other nations. Originally Posted by ox So says Theo Hobson, British theologian. Originally Posted by geordief Is religion not just another form of tribalism? To be a member of the tribe you claim identity, feel safer, make friends. Could be a reference to large fossils.
What they have found are simple rules to explain life and the universe.Life exists because of evolution by the simple process of selection. I have to believe that scientists are not deliberately looking for complexity. It could be that people turn back to religion in only very hard times.In Africa, religion is not a choice.
At best they will try to change the subject, at worst they become threatening.